A report by Continental Research, covered in the Guardian here,
argues that micropayment systems would be more palatable to consumers than monthly or annual subscription systems.
Apparently “When it came to micropayments, 35% of respondents said they would be prepared to pay 2p per article, 22% would pay 5p, 13% 10p and just 6% 20p for each piece of online content.”
Even at 2p per article, that’s a CPM rate of £20, which is more than most sites can charge for ads! It almost sounds too good to be true!
Over the last few years a plethora of different surveys have reached very different conclusions about micropayments (maybe a case of “He who pays the piper calls the tune”).
I’ve been involved with the internet since about 1993, and I can remember talk of micropayments going back as far as the year dot. So how come we’ve had 15 years and micropayments still haven’t taken off?
The fundamental issue here is one of psychology. It’s covered well in the book Free, by Chris Anderson.
If you pay a subscription, you only have to think about it once. After that, all your access appears free. If you use micropayments, every time you want to access an article your brain has to ask itself “Is it worth it?”. That’s the extra cognitive step that leads to trouble.
You might argue that mobile phones successfully use a Pay As You Go model, which is similar to micropayments for articles. So what’s the difference? Probably there are several. First, phone calls have never been free, so there’s no expectation that they should be. Second, perhaps people value the human interaction of a phone call more highly than reading an article, so they’re more willing to pay. Third, you only have to pay your phone bill to one company, whereas with micropayments you wouldn’t want to set up a new account with every provider.
But doesn’t Apple effectively use micropayments for the apps in its iPhone app store? Yes, it does. And similar to the Pay As You Go phone model above, it works for two reasons. One: users have been conditioned that apps were never solely free. Two: you always pay the bill to Apple, very easily, through an existing account that you’ve already created.
So what’s the bottom line? If there’s any hope for micropayments, there needs to be one single micropayment system that covers the vast majority of sites. Maybe the publishing industry just needs to get together and agree a standard system. Then we’ll finally see if the survey respondents who say they’d use micropayments will put their money where their mouth is! I’m not holding my breath.